Techno$chaft Run Amuck?

"Does Ridley Scott's vision of the future seem plausible- will techno$chaft lead naturally to this disarray (what Mike Davis calls "dystopia")- or has he got something wrong?"
Thesis:
We believe that Ridley Scott's depiction of the future in Blade Runner is a possible view of the way that technology is negatively affecting the world, but that it was impacted by the production value needed to sell the movie. This is our group's analysis.






Tuesday, May 5, 2009

Mike Davis & Ridley Scott

Ridley Scott, in collaboration with "visual futurist" Syd Mead, offered a pastiche of imaginary landscapes that Scott himself has conceded to be "overkill."
- Davis is pointing out that although Blade Runner portrays a possible view of the future it is still a movie. And to make a movie one must have a plot, characters and setting. So Ridley Scott along with a team of writers and producers created a dystopia only because that fit the plot of the movie he wanted to create.
- When creating a setting Scott looked to existing cities for inspiration and chose to ignore the positive things that exist in current cities and overemphasize the negative ones in order to create a bleak and dark future because that's what the movie called for.
> This is opposite of the idea of a utopian Disney World described by Sorkin, which uses the process of McDonaldization but emphasizes every aspect of the city positively.
This notion of overkill holds more significance after realizing that Scott took ideas that already exist and blew them out of proportion.
- Apartment complexes: Federally subsidized housing projects currently exist in places like Chicago and New York and all over the world. These projects are large, cheap buildings built in order to deal with housing shortages. These places were designed to be inhabited by poor families and funding for renovation and repairs is hard to come by so they easily fall into disarray.  
>The apartment buildings in Blade Runner could easily fit these descriptions; note that most of Earth's population lives on off-world colonies, so the large empty building J.F. Sebastian lives in all by himself could be the remains of federally built housing, built to combat rising populations, that became abandoned after the off-world colonies became the place to be.
- City Dwellers: Davis points out that an ordinance was put in to place in Los Angeles that restricted homeless people to sleeping in a 50 foot square block area of skid row. The problem was that people didn't want to see any homeless people because it was apparently unsightly. This was not done to create a safe place for the homeless to be or for the betterment of one group or another. 
>Blade Runner takes this concept to the extreme, Scott makes it appear as if earth itself is some kind of containment area. There are those with power and money that live lavishly (Tyrell Company), but the mob on the street is always portrayed as dirty and poor. It would appear that the middle class population, those that could afford it and passed a physical, have now populated off-world colonies. This ensures that on these colonies no one would ever have to encounter a poor person, or someone who didn't meet certain criteria allowing them to be there. This is a perfect example of a controlling force within the futuristic society. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Conclusion

So, did Ridley Scott create a probable future, a dystopia where techno$chaft takes over the human race?

 

Our analysis of the movie BladeRunner led us to believe that:

Technological advancements will negatively impact us through globalization. Obviously there are advancements like the invention of the wheel that have made life quite easier, but we think we have now developed a dependence on technology, and this in return will in fact be detrimental.

We don't know what the future holds but Scott provides one view, however it may be partially inaccurate due to the fact that everything had to be sexed up because it was a view created in Hollywood. Technology also isn't inevitably going to make life easier for everyone, although certain aspects of the movie were probable, including city speak and voice control. Scott overemphasized the negative aspects of modern cities to create an interesting movie, but the fact still remains that the things that got overemphasized, large corporations gained lots of power, there were extreme forms of advertising, dependence on technology, and increased surveillance and security do in fact exist in cities now, just to a lesser degree.

The most important part though, is that one should not completely believe that the future would inevitably resemble Blade Runner because Ridley Scott is a director, not an urban geographer.

 

If we could have conducted more research, we would have based our findings on actual theses by real urban geographers, and studied other movies, books and productions to see what other people said about this.