Techno$chaft Run Amuck?

"Does Ridley Scott's vision of the future seem plausible- will techno$chaft lead naturally to this disarray (what Mike Davis calls "dystopia")- or has he got something wrong?"
Thesis:
We believe that Ridley Scott's depiction of the future in Blade Runner is a possible view of the way that technology is negatively affecting the world, but that it was impacted by the production value needed to sell the movie. This is our group's analysis.






Thursday, May 7, 2009

Sorkin

Michael Sorkin’s article on Disneyland relates to Blade Runner in many ways.

 

1.)   Disneyland and the off-world colonies seem to be the epitome of a utopian environment. I say this, because of Walt Disney’s views on what his ‘perfect city’ should look like.

 

‘Disneyland will be something of a fair, an exhibition, a playground, a community center, a museum of living facts, and a showplace of beauty and magic. It will be filled with the accomplishments, the joys, the hopes of the world we live in. And it will remind us and show us how to make those wonders part of our lives (Sorkin 336).’

 

‘…the fairs also became models, adopted visionary urbanism as an aspect of their agendas, both offering themselves as models of urban organization and providing, within their pavilions, panoramic visions of even more advanced cities to come (Sorkin 338).’

 

In Blade Runner, the city seems like such a dirty dystopia. You’re either wealthy high class living in lavish penthouses or you’re ‘little people’ on the streets, statically existing. The ideal spot to be is on the off-world colonies where life is care-free, crime-free, and problem-free. Just like Disneyland. The search for a utopian city or way of life has been around for centuries. Humans are always on this search, for a better and safe way to live. Sorkin even referenced this search in his article. Starting in Europe, people migrated to America, in search of these ‘utopian cities’, ex: Shakers, Quakers, Mormons, etc. this migration relates to the off-world colonies in blade runner, and people wanting to live on them, and Disney’s goal of creating such a place.

 

2.)   The Replicants in Blade Runner are like the Disneyland workers.

‘…but - perhaps in part because a man in a mouse costume is a more genial image of

Dehumanization than a prole in chains - this "servant space" (Sorkin 351).’

Disney workers are like the Replicants by becoming this fake character, and doing work in an environment that portrays reality but is incredibly ‘make-believe’. The workers wear costumes and gain this plastic like appearance and are forced to smile the entire time they are in the public eye. Their name no longer means anything to anyone, nor their memories or hopes and dreams. Once inside the Disneyland walls, they become Cinderella, Snow White, or Goofy. Your are unable to tell if a Replicant is human or robot because they don an equal human appearance. The Replicants are forced to do some sort of work on the off-world colonies, while the Disneyland workers are controlled by the ever watching eye from within.

 

 

3.)   Disneyland in relation to the Tyrell Corporation

Disneyland is the Tyrell Corporation. It has complete control over everything within. It has its own money, which is equivalent to the dollar, but you must exchange anyway. Disney even envisioned having total control over policing, surveillance, regulations, taxing, and governing. He created these characters that children idolize with the ultimate little girl’s goal that every beauty has a prince charming. With Disney leading the way, everyone would be equal; communism at its finest.

‘…offering the fecund communism of abundance and leisure, a true technocratic postindustrial utopia (Sorkin 347).’

Disneyland and the city in Blade Runner both feed into Mcdonaldization, globalization, and techno$haft. Both places want their environments to run efficiently, with predictability, control, calculability. Globalization and techno$haft is shown in the Ridley Scott’s views of a city controlled by advertisements, and extensive technology. The movie was made to look like the entire planet earth had turned into a dystopia, not just the city of Los Angeles. You can see globalization in Disneyland by being able to visit different countries, without ever having to really go there. Within those walls, you can be here, there, and everywhere. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Conclusion

So, did Ridley Scott create a probable future, a dystopia where techno$chaft takes over the human race?

 

Our analysis of the movie BladeRunner led us to believe that:

Technological advancements will negatively impact us through globalization. Obviously there are advancements like the invention of the wheel that have made life quite easier, but we think we have now developed a dependence on technology, and this in return will in fact be detrimental.

We don't know what the future holds but Scott provides one view, however it may be partially inaccurate due to the fact that everything had to be sexed up because it was a view created in Hollywood. Technology also isn't inevitably going to make life easier for everyone, although certain aspects of the movie were probable, including city speak and voice control. Scott overemphasized the negative aspects of modern cities to create an interesting movie, but the fact still remains that the things that got overemphasized, large corporations gained lots of power, there were extreme forms of advertising, dependence on technology, and increased surveillance and security do in fact exist in cities now, just to a lesser degree.

The most important part though, is that one should not completely believe that the future would inevitably resemble Blade Runner because Ridley Scott is a director, not an urban geographer.

 

If we could have conducted more research, we would have based our findings on actual theses by real urban geographers, and studied other movies, books and productions to see what other people said about this.